Diagnostic accuracy of lumbar CT and MRI in the evaluation of chronic low back pain without red flag symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most frequent reasons for medical consultation. Most of the patients will have nonspecific LBP, which usually are self-limited episodes. It is unclear which of the diagnostic imaging pathways is most effective and costeffective and how the imaging impacts on patient treatment. Imaging techniques are usually indicated if symptoms remain after 6 weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the diagnostic imaging examination of choice in lumbar spine evaluation of low back pain; however, availability of MRI is limited. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) with MRI (as standard of reference) in the evaluation of chronic low back pain (LBP) without red flags symptoms. To compare the results obtained by two radiologists with different grades of experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with chronic low back pain without red flags symptoms were retrospectively reviewed by two observers with different level of experience. Patients included had undergone a lumbar or abdominal CT and an MRI within a year. Once the radiological information was collected, it was then statistically reviewed. The aim of the statistical analysis is to identify the equivalence between both diagnostic techniques. To this end, sensitivity, specificity and validity index were calculated. In addition, intra and inter-observer reliability were measured by Cohen's kappa values and also using the McNemar test. RESULTS: 340 lumbar levels were evaluated from 68 adult patients with chronic low back pain or sciatica. 63.2% of them were women, with an average age of 60.3 years (SD 14.7). CT shows high values of sensitivity and specificity (>80%) in most of the items evaluated, but sensitivity was low for the evaluation of density of the disc (40%) and for the detection of disc herniation (55%). Moreover, agreement between MRI and CT in most of these items was substantial or almost perfect (Cohen's kappa-coefficient > 0'8), excluding Modic changes (kappa = 0.497), degenerative changes (kappa0.688), signal of the disc (kappa = 0.327) and disc herniation (kappa = 0.639). Finally, agreement between both observers is mostly high (kappa > 0.8). Foraminal stenosis, canal stenosis and the grade of the canal stenosis were overdiagnosed by the inexperienced observer in the evaluation of CT images. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: CT is as sensitive as lumbar MRI in the evaluation of most of the items analysed, excluding Modic changes, degenerative changes, signal of the disc and disc herniation. In addition, these results are obtained regardless the experience of the radiologist. The rising use of diagnostic medical imaging and the improvement of image quality brings the opportunity of making a second look of abdominal CT in search of causes of LBP. Thereby, inappropriate medical imaging could be avoided (2). In addition, it would allow to reduce MRI waiting list and prioritize other patients with more severe pathology than LBP.

Allergy to cypress and olive pollen: Clinical phenotypes and allergen recognition.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cypress and olive pollen are the most prevalent sensitizer trees in the Mediterranean area. Some patients exhibit a dual sensitization which has not been well documented yet. To identify the allergens involved in the dual cypress and olive allergy (C+O) and study the relationship between phenotype and allergen sensitization. METHODS: C+O patients were selected. Monosensitized subjects to olive or cypress were used as reference. Specific IgE to whole extracts and purified allergens from olive and cypress were performed. Immunoblotting was done to analyze IgG and IgE-binding using olive polyclonal antibodies and patients' sera, respectively. Mutual immunoblotting inhibition of olive and cypress extracts, and inhibition of cypress extract immunoblotting with olive allergens were performed. Multiple correspondence analysis and hierarchical cluster classifications were conducted to analyze the relationships between C+O clinical presentation (symptoms, seasonality) and allergen profile. RESULTS: C+O patients were clustered in 4 phenotypes. The most frequent one (58.4%) was rhinoconjunctivitis in winter (February) and spring (May), with asthma in 38% of subjects. Ole e 1 and Cup s 1 were the major allergens. Homologous proteins to Ole e 1, Ole e 9 and Ole e 11 in cypress pollen were identified and these olive allergens inhibit IgE-binding to cypress extract. CONCLUSIONS: The exclusive C+O allergy results from co-sensitization to Cup s 1 and Ole e 1, and to cross-reactivity due to Ole e 1-like, Ole e 9-like and Ole e 11-like allergens not described previously, and translates into 4 clinical phenotypes of winter and/or spring or perennial rhinoconjunctivitis with and without asthma.

Mild sensory symptoms during SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare professionals.

INTRODUCTION: It is not yet possible to estimate the proportion of patients with COVID-19 who present distinguishable classical neurological symptoms and syndromes. The objective of this study is to estimate the incidence of sensory symptoms (hypoaesthesia, paraesthesia, and hyperalgesia) in physicians who have presented the disease at Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón (HUFA) in Madrid; to establish the relationship between sensory symptoms and the presence of other signs of infection; and to study their association with the severity of COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective, observational study. HUFA physicians who presented SARS-CoV-2 infection between 1 March and 25 July 2020 were included in the study. A voluntary, anonymous survey was distributed via corporate email. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected from professionals with PCR- or serology-confirmed COVID-19. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 801 physicians and we received 89 responses. The mean age of respondents was 38.28 years. A total of 17.98% presented sensory symptoms. A significant relationship was found between the presence of paraesthesia and cough, fever, myalgia, asthaenia, and dyspnoea. A significant relationship was also found between paraesthesia and the need for treatment and admission due to COVID-19. Sensory symptoms were present from the fifth day of illness in 87.4% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection can be associated with sensory symptoms, mostly in severe cases. Sensory symptoms often appear after a time interval, and may be caused by a parainfectious syndrome with an autoimmunity background.

Estudio poblacional de casuística y morbimortalidad de la prostatectomía radical en España / Population based study of morbidity and mortality rates associated to radical prostatectomy cases in Spain

Introducción: No existe ningún estudio poblacional que contabilice en número de prostatectomías radicales (PR) realizadas España, ni la morbimortalidad de dicha intervención.Nuestro objetivo es estudiar la morbimortalidad de la PR en España desde el 2011 al 2015 y evaluar la variabilidad geográfica. Material y métodos: Diseñamos un estudio observacional retrospectivo de todos los pacientes intervenidos de PR en España durante cinco años consecutivos (2011-2015) a partir de los datos registrados en el Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos (CMBD).Hemos estudiado la distribución del número de casos y la variabilidad intercomunitaria en términos de morbilidad y de estancia hospitalaria, así como el impacto del volumen quirúrgico medio anual por cada centro en dichas variables. Resultados: Entre los años 2011-2015 se han realizado un total de 37.725 PR en 221 hospitales españoles públicos del sistema nacional de salud. La edad media de la serie fue 63,9 ± 3,23 años. El 50% de las PR se han realizado por vía abierta, y un 43,4% se han intervenido en hospitales de < 500 camas. Encontramos una gran variabilidad en la distribución de los casos intervenidos en las distintas Comunidades Autónomas (CCAA Las comunidades que realizan un mayor número de prostatectomías son Andalucía, Cataluña, Galicia y Madrid. La tasa de complicaciones a nivel nacional es de 8,6%, siendo las más frecuentes la hemorragia y necesidad de transfusión (5,3 y 4%, respectivamente). Encontramos importantes diferencias en las tasas de hemorragia y en la estancia hospitalaria entre las distintas CCAA, que se mantienen tras ajustar por las características del paciente y del tipo de hospital. Al estudiar el volumen quirúrgico anual de cada hospital vemos que el impacto en la tasa de hemorragia o transfusión es lineal sin embargo en la estancia a partir de 60 PR/año la estancia se mantiene estable en torno a cinco días. (AU)

Introduction: There is no population-based study that accounts for the number of radical prostatectomies (RP) carried out in Spain, nor regarding the morbidity and mortality of this intervention.Our objective is to study the morbidity and mortality of RP in Spain from 2011 to 2015 and to evaluate the geographic variation. Material and methods: We designed a retrospective observational study of all patients submitted to RP in Spain during five consecutive years (2011-2015). The data was extracted from the «Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos» (CMBD).We have evaluated geographic variations in terms of morbidity and hospital stay, and the impact of the mean annual surgical volume for each center on these variables. Results: Between 2011-2015, a total of 37,725 RPs were performed in 221 Spanish public hospitals. The mean age of the series was 63.9 ± 3.23 years. Of all RPs, 50% were performed through an open approach, and 43.4% have been operated on in hospitals with < 500 beds. We observed an important variability in the distribution of the cases operated on in the different regions. The regions that perform more RPs are Andalusia, Catalonia, Galicia, and Madrid. Our study shows a complication rate of 8.6%, with hemorrhage and the need for transfusion being the most frequent (5.3 and 4%, respectively). There are significant differences in bleeding rates and hospital stay among regions, which are maintained after adjusting for patient characteristics and type of hospital. When studying the annual surgical volume of each hospital, we find that the impact on the rate of hemorrhage or transfusion is linear; however, hospital stay remains stable at around 5 days from 60 RPs/year (AU)

Population based study of morbidity and mortality rates associated to radical prostatectomy cases in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: There is no population-based study that accounts for the number of radical prostatectomies (RP) carried out in Spain, nor regarding the morbidity and mortality of this intervention. Our objective is to study the morbidity and mortality of RP in Spain from 2011 to 2015 and to evaluate the geographic variation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We designed a retrospective observational study of all patients submitted to RP in Spain during five consecutive years (2011-2015). The data was extracted from the «Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos¼ (CMBD). We have evaluated geographic variations in terms of morbidity and hospital stay, and the impact of the mean annual surgical volume for each center on these variables. RESULTS: Between 2011-2015, a total of 37,725 RPs were performed in 221 Spanish public hospitals. The mean age of the series was 63.9±3.23 years. Of all RPs, 50% were performed through an open approach, and 43.4% have been operated on in hospitals with <500 beds. We observed an important variability in the distribution of the cases operated on in the different regions. The regions that perform more RPs are Andalusia, Catalonia, Galicia, and Madrid. Our study shows a complication rate of 8.6%, with hemorrhage and the need for transfusion being the most frequent (5.3 and 4%, respectively). There are significant differences in bleeding rates and hospital stay among regions, which are maintained after adjusting for patient characteristics and type of hospital. When studying the annual surgical volume of each hospital, we find that the impact on the rate of hemorrhage or transfusion is linear; however, hospital stay remains stable at around 5 days from 60 RPs/year. CONCLUSIONS: In national terms, morbidity and mortality rates after RP are comparable to those described in the literature. This study reveals a clear dispersion in the hospitals that carry out this intervention, showing clear differences in terms of morbidity and hospital stay between the different regions.

Longitudinal study of the newborn small for gestational age. Growth recovery and conditioning factors / Estudio longitudinal del recién nacido pequeño para la edad gestacional. Crecimiento recuperador y factores condicionantes

Background: small-for-gestational-age (SGA) newborns present a higher morbidity and mortality rate when compared to infants born appropriate for gestational age (AGA), as well as insufficient growth, with height far from their target and in some cases a low final height (< -2 SDs). Objective: the aim of this study was to determine when catch-up growth (CUG) in height occurs in these children, and which factors are associated with lack of CUG. Material and methods: this is a retrospective study of SGAs born between 2011 and 2015 in a secondary hospital. Anthropometric measurements were taken consecutively until CUG was reached, and fetal, placental, parental, newborn, and postnatal variables were studied. Results: a total of 358 SGAs were included from a total of 5,585 live newborns. At 6 and 48 months of life, 93.6 % and 96.4 % of SGAs achieved CUG, respectively. By subgroups, symmetric SGAs performed worse than asymmetric SGAs with CUG in 84 % and 92 % at 6 and 48 months of life, respectively. The same occurred in the subgroup of preterm SGAs with respect to term SGAs, with worse CUGs of 88.2 % and 91.2 % at 6 and 48 months of life, respectively. Prematurity, symmetrical SGA, intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), preeclampsia, previous child SGA, perinatal morbidity, and comorbidity during follow-up were associated with absence of CUG. Conclusions: the majority of SGAs had CUG in the first months of life. The worst outcomes were for preterm and symmetric SGAs (AU)

Antecedentes: el recién nacido pequeño para la edad gestacional (PEG) presenta mayor morbimortalidad que el recién nacido con peso adecuado (PAEG), así como un crecimiento insuficiente con talla alejada de la talla diana y, en algunos casos, talla final baja (< -2 DE). Objetivo: el objetivo de este estudio fue determinar en qué momento se produce el crecimiento compensador (CUG) de la talla en estos niños y conocer qué factores se asocian a la falta de dicho crecimiento compensador. Material y métodos: estudio retrospectivo de los recién nacidos PEG entre los años 2011 y 2015 en un hospital secundario. Se tomaron medidas antropométricas de forma consecutiva hasta alcanzar el CUG y se estudiaron las variables fetales, placentarias, parentales, neonatales y posnatales. Resultados: se incluyeron 358 PEG de un total de 5585 recién nacidos vivos. A los 6 y 48 meses de vida alcanzaron el CUG el 93,6 % y 96,4 % de los PEG, respectivamente. Por subgrupos, los PEG simétricos obtuvieron peores resultados que los PEG asimétricos, con CUG del 84 % y 92 % a los 6 y 48 meses de vida, respectivamente. Lo mismo ocurrió en el subgrupo de PEG prematuros respecto de los PEG a término, con CUG peores del 88,2 % y 91,2 % a los 6 y 48 meses de vida, respectivamente. La prematuridad, el PEG simétrico, la restricción del crecimiento intrauterino, la preeclampsia, tener un hijo previo PEG, la morbilidad perinatal y la comorbilidad durante el seguimiento se asociaron a la ausencia de CUG. Conclusiones: la mayoría de los PEG alcanzaron el CUG en los primeros meses de vida. Los peores resultados fueron para los PEG prematuros y simétricos (AU)

Incidence of Fatal Anaphylaxis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.

BACKGROUND: Fatal anaphylaxis is very rare, with an incidence ranging from 0.5 to 1 deaths per million person-years. OBJECTIVE: Based on a systematic review, we aimed to explain differences in the reported incidence of fatal anaphylaxis based on the methodological and demographic factors addressed in the various studies. METHODS: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Web of Science for relevant retrospective and prospective cohort studies and registry studies that had assessed the anaphylaxis mortality rate for the population of a country or for an administrative region. The research strategy was based on combining the term "anaphylaxis" with "death", "study design", and "main outcomes" (incidence). RESULTS: A total of 46 studies met the study criteria and included 16,541 deaths. The range of the anaphylaxis mortality rate for all causes of anaphylaxis was 0.002-2.51 deaths per million person-years. Fatal anaphylaxis due to food (range 0.002-0.29) was rarer than deaths due to drugs (range 0.004-0.56) or Hymenoptera venom (range 0.02-0.61). The frequency of deaths due to anaphylaxis by drugs increased during the study period (IRR per year, 1.02; 95%CI, 1.00-1.04). We detected considerable heterogeneity in almost all of the meta-analyses carried out. CONCLUSION: The incidence of fatal anaphylaxis is very low and differs according to the various subgroups analyzed. The studies were very heterogeneous. Fatal anaphylaxis due to food seems to be less common than fatal anaphylaxis due to drugs or Hymenoptera venom.

Incidence of Fatal Anaphylaxis A Systematic Review of Observational Studies

Background: Fatal anaphylaxis is very rare, with an incidence ranging from 0.5 to 1 deaths per million person-years. Objective: Based on a systematic review, we aimed to explain differences in the reported incidence of fatal anaphylaxis based on the methodological and demographic factors addressed in the various studies. Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Web of Science for relevant retrospective and prospective cohort studies and registry studies that had assessed the anaphylaxis mortality rate for the population of a country or for an administrative region. The research strategy was based on combining the term “anaphylaxis” with “death”, “study design”, and “main outcomes” (incidence). Results: A total of 46 studies met the study criteria and included 16,541 deaths. The range of the anaphylaxis mortality rate for all causes of anaphylaxis was 0.002-2.51 deaths per million person-years. Fatal anaphylaxis due to food (range 0.002-0.29) was rarer than deaths due to drugs (range 0.004-0.56) or Hymenoptera venom (range 0.02-0.61). The frequency of deaths due to anaphylaxis by drugs increased during the study period (IRR per year, 1.02; 95%CI, 1.00-1.04). We detected considerable heterogeneity in almost all of the meta-analyses carried out. Conclusion: The incidence of fatal anaphylaxis is very low and differs according to the various subgroups analyzed. The studies were very heterogeneous. Fatal anaphylaxis due to food seems to be less common than fatal anaphylaxis due to drugs or Hymenoptera venom (AU)

Antecedentes: La muerte por anafilaxia es un evento muy excepcional, con una incidencia que varía de 0,5 a 1 muerte por millón de personas/año. Objetivo: Usando las técnicas de una revisión sistemática, nuestro objetivo ha sido explicar las diferencias en la incidencia informada de la muerte por anafilaxia atendiendo a diversos factores metodológicos y demográficos empleados en los diversos estudios de la revisión. Métodos: Se realizaron búsquedas en PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE y Web of Science, con el fin de obtener estudios de cohortes y registros prospectivos y retrospectivos relevantes que hubieran evaluado la tasa de muerte por anafilaxia en la población de un país o una región administrativa. La estrategia de investigación se basó en combinar “anafilaxia” con “muerte”, “diseño del estudio” y “resultados principales” (incidencia). Resultados: Un total de 46 estudios cumplieron con los criterios del estudio. Los estudios incluyeron 16.541 muertes. El rango de la tasa de mortalidad por anafilaxia para todas las causas de anafilaxia fue de 0,002 a 2,51 muertes por millón de personas/año. La anafilaxia mortal debida a los alimentos (rango 0,002-0,29) fue más rara que las muertes debidas a medicamentos (rango 0,004-0,56) o veneno de himenópteros (rango 0,02-0,61). La frecuencia de muertes por anafilaxia por fármacos aumentó durante el período de estudio (IRR por año, 1,02; IC del 95%: 1,00-1,04). Se detectó una heterogeneidad considerable en casi todos los metaanálisis realizados. Conclusión: La incidencia de anafilaxia mortal es muy baja y difiere según los distintos subgrupos analizados. Los estudios fueron muy heterogéneos. La muerte por anafilaxia debida a alimentos parece ser menos común que la anafilaxia mortal debida a fármacos o por veneno de himenópteros (AU)

Differential risk for COVID-19 in the first wave of the disease among Spaniards and migrants from different areas of the world living in Spain.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known regarding the relevance of racial/ethnic background to the risk for COVID-19 infection, particularly in Europe. We evaluated the risk of COVID-19 among migrants from different areas of the world within the context of universal free access to medical care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort analysis of the cumulative incidence of PCR-confirmed COVID-19 among adult residents of Alcorcon (Spain) in the first wave of the disease up to April 25, 2020. RESULTS: The crude cumulative incidence among migrants (n = 20419) was higher than among Spaniards (n = 131599): 8.81 and 6.51 and per 1000 inhabitants, respectively (p <  .001), but differed by region of origin. As per a negative binomial regression adjusted for age and sex, relative risk (RR) for COVID-19 for individuals from Europe, Asia, or North Africa was not significantly different from Spaniards. In contrast, a markedly increased risk was found in people from Sub-Saharan Africa (RR 3.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42-9.41, p =  .007), the Caribbean (RR 6.35, 95% CI 3.83-10.55, p <  .001), and Latin America (RR 6.92, 95% CI 4.49-10.67, p <  .001). CONCLUSIONS: Migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean, and Latin America exhibited increased risk for COVID-19 as compared to Spaniards or migrants from Europe, North Africa, or Asia. Our data suggest ethnic background may play a role in risk for COVID-19. Migrants from some areas of the world may merit closer attention for both clinical and epidemiological reasons.

Riesgo de COVID-19 en españoles y migrantes de distintas zonas del mundo residentes en España en la primera oleada de la enfermedad / Differential risk for COVID-19 in the first wave of the disease among Spaniards and migrants from different areas of the world living in Spain

Introducción y objetivo Existen pocos estudios sobre el potencial papel de los orígenes raciales/étnicos en el riesgo de infección de COVID-19, particularmente en Europa. Evaluamos el riesgo de COVID-19 entre los migrantes de diferentes zonas del mundo en un contexto de acceso universal gratuito a la atención médica. Material y métodos Realizamos un análisis de cohortes poblacional de la incidencia acumulada de COVID-19 confirmada mediante PCR entre los residentes adultos en Alcorcón (España) en la primera oleada de la enfermedad hasta el 25 de abril de 2020. Resultados La incidencia acumulada bruta entre los migrantes (n=20.419) fue mayor que entre los españoles (n=131.599): 8,81 y 6,51 por cada 1.000 habitantes, respectivamente (p<0,001), pero difería según la región de origen mundial. Mediante regresión binomial negativa, ajustada por edad y sexo, los riesgos relativos (RR) para COVID-19 no fueron significativamente diferentes de los españoles para los individuos provenientes de Europa, Asia o el norte de África. Por el contrario, hubo un marcado aumento del riesgo para los del África subsahariana (RR 3,66, intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC] 1,42-9,41, p=0,007), el Caribe (RR 6,35, IC 95% 3,83-10,55, p<0,001) y América Latina (RR 6,92, IC 95% 4,49-10,67, p<0,001). Conclusiones Los migrantes procedentes del África subsahariana, el Caribe y América Latina, a diferencia de los españoles o migrantes procedentes de Europa, el norte de África o Asia, presentaron un mayor riesgo de COVID-19. Nuestros datos sugieren un papel para el origen étnico en el riesgo de COVID-19. Los migrantes de algunas zonas del mundo pueden merecer una atención más cercana tanto por razones clínicas como epidemiológicas (AU)

Introduction and objectives Little is known regarding the relevance of racial/ethnic background to the risk for COVID-19 infection, particularly in Europe. We evaluated the risk of COVID-19 among migrants from different areas of the world within the context of universal free access to medical care. Material and methods We conducted a population-based cohort analysis of the cumulative incidence of PCR-confirmed COVID-19 among adult residents of Alcorcon (Spain) in the first wave of the disease up to April 25, 2020. Results The crude cumulative incidence among migrants (n=20,419) was higher than among Spaniards (n=131,599): 8.81 and 6.51 and per 1,000 inhabitants, respectively (p<.001), but differed by region of origin. As per a negative binomial regression adjusted for age and sex, relative risk (RR) for COVID-19 for individuals from Europe, Asia, or North Africa was not significantly different from Spaniards. In contrast, a markedly increased risk was found for people from Sub-Saharan Africa (RR 3.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42-9.41, p=.007), the Caribbean (RR 6.35, 95% CI 3.83-10.55, p<.001), and Latin America (RR 6.92, 95% CI 4.49-10.67, p<.001). Conclusions Migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean, and Latin America exhibited increased risk for COVID-19 as compared to Spaniards or migrants from Europe, North Africa, or Asia. Our data suggest that the ethnic background may play a role in risk for COVID-19. Migrants from some areas of the world may merit closer attention for both clinical and epidemiological reasons (AU)

Estrategia de planificación y ejecución de un estudio a gran escala de seroprevalencia de SARS-CoV-2 en trabajadores de un hospital universitario durante una situación de pandemia / Strategy for planning and execution of a large-scale SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence study on teaching hospital workers during a pandemic situation

OBJETIVO: Describir el proceso de planificación y ejecución de un estudio masivo de seroprevalencia para SARS-CoV-2 en los profesionales del Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón (HUFA) (España). MÉTODO: Se efectúa una descripción del plan diseñado y desarrollado en el HUFA para la realización de las extracciones de las muestras para serología en el total de los profesionales que prestan servicio en el hospital, entre el 14 y el 29 de abril del 2020. Se lleva a cabo un análisis descriptivo de la participación de los profesionales en el estudio. De igual manera, se planificaron zonas de extracción, personal sanitario y tiempos de ejecución. Se asignaron 2.326 extracciones a personal sanitario, el resto fueron a trabajadores de las empresas externas. RESULTADOS: Participaron en el estudio 2.641 trabajadores (90,5%) de 2.918 candidatos. La categoría profesional que más se analizó globalmente fue la de enfermería con un 28,3% (n = 590). El porcentaje de cumplimiento de la organización de los horarios fue del 28,6%. Se planificó hasta un máximo de 298 extracciones diarias. El día con más afluencia fue el cuarto con 399 extracciones. CONCLUSIONES: El hecho de organizar un dispositivo tan grande con un alcance al 100% de los trabajadores que prestan servicio en el hospital, y con una respuesta tan mayoritaria por parte de ellos, ha permitido que el estudio de seroprevalencia realizado obtenga unos resultados con alta fiabilidad. Aunque el porcentaje de participación fue muy alto, el grado de cumplimiento de la planificación fue reducido

OBJECTIVE: To describe the planning and execution process of a massive seroprevalence study for SARS-CoV-2 in professionals of the Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón (HUFA) (Spain). METHODS: A description is presented of the plan designed and developed at the HUFA for the execution of the extraction of the samples for serology from all the professionals who worked in the hospital between 14 and 29 April 2020. A descriptive analysis of the participation of the professionals in the study is carried out. Extraction areas, health personnel, and execution times were planned. A total of 2326 extractions were assigned to health personnel, the remaining extractions were assigned to workers from external companies. RESULTS: A total of 2641 workers (90.5%) out of 2918 candidates participated in the study. The professional category most analysed was nursing with 28.3% (n = 590). The percentage of compliance with schedule planning was 28.6%. Up to a maximum of 298 daily extractions were planned. The busiest day was the 4th day of the study with 399 extractions. CONCLUSIONS: The organising of such a large study, with a 100% coverage of those who worked in the hospital, and with such a great response from the workers involved, has led to obtaining results of high reliability in the seroprevalence study carried out. Although the percentage of participation was very high, the level of compliance with the planning was low

Melanocytic lesions with peripheral globules: results of an observational prospective study in 154 high-risk melanoma patients under digital dermoscopy follow-up evaluated with reflectance confocal microscopy.

BACKGROUND: The management of melanocytic lesions with peripheral globules (MLPGs) is usually age-dependent and can be challenging in high-risk melanoma patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical, dermoscopic and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) features of MLPG in patients under digital dermoscopic surveillance. To know whether dermoscopic or RCM findings correlate with histologic diagnosis and the accuracy of the dermoscopy-RCM compared with histopathology. METHODS: During 24 months, we prospectively enrolled MLPG in patients under digital dermoscopy follow-up. All were evaluated by dermoscopy and RCM and excised for histologic examination. RESULTS: We enrolled 154 patients, mean age 42.45 years (18.78-73.19). Three melanomas and 19 dysplastic naevi (DNs) were diagnosed. There were no significant differences in the age of the patients (P = 0.662). MLPGs with diameter of 6 mm or more and asymmetry in two axes were associated with melanoma (P = 0.01, P = 0.003). Patients with more than one MLPG were less likely to have melanoma. Blue-grey and red colours were more frequent in melanoma (P = 0.013 and P = 0.000). Different sizes and shapes of PG were associated with DN and melanoma (P = 0.000 and P = 0.001). In a new lesion, PG in <25% of the circumference was related to malignancy (P = 0.010). RCM signs of malignancy were related to melanoma: pagetoid cells (P = 0.000), non-edged papillae (P = 0.001), atypical junctional thickenings (P = 0.000) and atypical cells at the dermal-epidermal junction (P = 0.000). Dense irregular nests were associated to melanoma (P = 0.019). Dermoscopy and confocal evaluation were able to diagnose 100% of melanomas and 84.21% of DNs. The kappa coefficient between dermoscopy-RCM vs. histology was 0.76. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend to excise a MLPG when it presents asymmetry in two axes, 6 or more mm, new lesion with PG in less than the 25% of the circumference, irregular size and shape PGs and irregular dense nests on RCM, regardless of the patient's age.

[Strategy for planning and execution of a large-scale SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence study on teaching hospital workers during a pandemic situation]. / Estrategia de planificación y ejecución de un estudio a gran escala de seroprevalencia de SARS-CoV-2 en trabajadores de un hospital universitario durante una situación de pandemia.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the planning and execution process of a massive seroprevalence study for SARS-CoV-2 in professionals of the Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón (HUFA) (Spain). METHODS: A description is presented of the plan designed and developed at the HUFA for the execution of the extraction of the samples for serology from all the professionals who worked in the hospital between 14 and 29 April 2020. A descriptive analysis of the participation of the professionals in the study is carried out. Extraction areas, health personnel, and execution times were planned. A total of 2326 extractions were assigned to health personnel, the remaining extractions were assigned to workers from external companies. RESULTS: A total of 2641 workers (90.5%) out of 2918 candidates participated in the study. The professional category most analysed was nursing with 28.3% (n = 590). The percentage of compliance with schedule planning was 28.6%. Up to a maximum of 298 daily extractions were planned. The busiest day was the 4th day of the study with 399 extractions. CONCLUSIONS: The organising of such a large study, with a 100% coverage of those who worked in the hospital, and with such a great response from the workers involved, has led to obtaining results of high reliability in the seroprevalence study carried out. Although the percentage of participation was very high, the level of compliance with the planning was low.

Association Between Severity of Anaphylaxis and Co-occurrence of Respiratory Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Asthma is very prevalent in all grades of severity of anaphylaxis. Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been associated with the severity of anaphylaxis. Objective: We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the influence of respiratory diseases on the severity of anaphylaxis. METHODS: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Web of Science for observational studies. The target studies were those that compared the severity of anaphylaxis between patients who had or did not have respiratory diseases. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies assessed the severity of anaphylaxis in respiratory disease. Respiratory disease increased the severity of anaphylaxis (OR, 1.87; 95%CI, 1.30-2.70), as did asthma (OR, 1.89; 95%CI, 1.26-2.83). For the meta-analysis of all studies (adjusted and nonadjusted), COPD increased the severity of anaphylaxis (OR, 2.47; 95%CI, 1.46-4.18). In the case of asthma studies, only 1 study assessed the influence of severity of asthma on severity of anaphylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence showing that respiratory disease increases the severity of anaphylaxis is low to moderate, although studies do not usually assess the importance of severity of asthma.

HAE-AS: A Specific Disease Activity Scale for Hereditary Angioedema With C1-Inhibitor Deficiency.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The activity of hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) varies between patients and within individual patients. Objective: This study aims to develop a disease activity scale for C1-INH-HAE (HAE-AS) with sound measurement properties. METHODS: Eleven countries participated in a prospective multicenter cohort study. A clinical questionnaire was self-completed by 290 adult patients with C1-INH-HAE. Patients also completed 2 quality of life scales, the SF-36v2 and the HAE-QoL. Rasch analysis and classic psychometric methods were used to preselect a series of clinical items: number of attacks by location and number of treated attacks, emergency room visits, psychological/psychiatric treatment, missed school/workdays in the previous 6 months; general health; and impairment in everyday work/activities due to pain. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age was 41.5 (14.7; range, 18-84) years, and 69% were females. The final 12-item Rasch model showed that the HAE-AS had satisfactory reliability (person separation index, 0.748), local item independence, unidimensionality, and no item bias by age or sex. The HAE-AS provided scores in a linear measure, with a mean of 10.66 (3.92; range, 0-30). Further analysis with classic psychometric methods indicated that the HAE-AS linear measure presented moderate-to-high convergent validity with quality of life scales (SF-36v2: physical component, r=-0.33; mental component, 0.555; HAE-QoL, -0.61), and good discriminative validity by age, sex, and disease severity (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The HAE-AS is a short, valid, reliable, and psychometrically sound measure of the activity of C1-INH-HAE that could prove useful for research studies.

[Differential risk for COVID-19 in the first wave of the disease among Spaniards and migrants from different areas of the world living in Spain]. / Riesgo de COVID-19 en españoles y migrantes de distintas zonas del mundo residentes en España en la primera oleada de la enfermedad.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known regarding the relevance of racial/ethnic background to the risk for COVID-19 infection, particularly in Europe. We evaluated the risk of COVID-19 among migrants from different areas of the world within the context of universal free access to medical care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort analysis of the cumulative incidence of PCR-confirmed COVID-19 among adult residents of Alcorcon (Spain) in the first wave of the disease up to April 25, 2020. RESULTS: The crude cumulative incidence among migrants (n = 20,419) was higher than among Spaniards (n = 131,599): 8.81 and 6.51 and per 1,000 inhabitants, respectively (p < .001), but differed by region of origin. As per a negative binomial regression adjusted for age and sex, relative risk (RR) for COVID-19 for individuals from Europe, Asia, or North Africa was not significantly different from Spaniards. In contrast, a markedly increased risk was found for people from Sub-Saharan Africa (RR 3.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42-9.41, p = .007), the Caribbean (RR 6.35, 95% CI 3.83-10.55, p < .001), and Latin America (RR 6.92, 95% CI 4.49-10.67, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean, and Latin America exhibited increased risk for COVID-19 as compared to Spaniards or migrants from Europe, North Africa, or Asia. Our data suggest that the ethnic background may play a role in risk for COVID-19. Migrants from some areas of the world may merit closer attention for both clinical and epidemiological reasons.

Differential risk for COVID-19 in the first wave of the disease among Spaniards and migrants from different areas of the world living in Spain. / Riesgo de COVID-19 en españoles y migrantes de distintas zonas del mundo residentes en España en la primera oleada de la enfermedad.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known regarding the relevance of racial/ethnic background to the risk for COVID-19 infection, particularly in Europe. We evaluated the risk of COVID-19 among migrants from different areas of the world within the context of universal free access to medical care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort analysis of the cumulative incidence of PCR-confirmed COVID-19 among adult residents of Alcorcon (Spain) in the first wave of the disease up to April 25, 2020. RESULTS: The crude cumulative incidence among migrants (n=20,419) was higher than among Spaniards (n=131,599): 8.81 and 6.51 and per 1,000 inhabitants, respectively (p<.001), but differed by region of origin. As per a negative binomial regression adjusted for age and sex, relative risk (RR) for COVID-19 for individuals from Europe, Asia, or North Africa was not significantly different from Spaniards. In contrast, a markedly increased risk was found for people from Sub-Saharan Africa (RR 3.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42-9.41, p=.007), the Caribbean (RR 6.35, 95% CI 3.83-10.55, p<.001), and Latin America (RR 6.92, 95% CI 4.49-10.67, p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean, and Latin America exhibited increased risk for COVID-19 as compared to Spaniards or migrants from Europe, North Africa, or Asia. Our data suggest that the ethnic background may play a role in risk for COVID-19. Migrants from some areas of the world may merit closer attention for both clinical and epidemiological reasons.